Among the underlying components of the S&P 500 index, we saw noteworthy options trading volume today in FedEx Corp (Symbol: FDX), where a total of 19,611 contracts have traded so far, representing approximately 2.0 million underlying shares. That amounts to about 95.2% of FDX’s average daily trading volume over the past month of 2.1 million shares. Particularly high volume was seen for the $250 strike put option expiring February 21, 2025, with 3,053 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 305,300 underlying shares of FDX. Below is a chart showing FDX’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $250 strike highlighted in orange:
NVIDIA Corp (Symbol: NVDA) saw options trading volume of 1.6 million contracts, representing approximately 157.2 million underlying shares or approximately 77.9% of NVDA’s average daily trading volume over the past month, of 201.7 million shares.
Particularly high volume was seen for the $140 strike call option expiring December 27, 2024, with 132,680 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 13.3 million underlying shares of NVDA. Below is a chart showing NVDA’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $140 strike highlighted in orange:
And lululemon athletica inc (Symbol: LULU) saw options trading volume of 10,090 contracts, representing approximately 1.0 million underlying shares or approximately 42.2% of LULU’s average daily trading volume over the past month, of 2.4 million shares.
Especially high volume was seen for the $400 strike call option expiring December 27, 2024, with 2,896 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 289,600 underlying shares of LULU. Below is a chart showing LULU’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $400 strike highlighted in orange:
For the various different available expirations for FDX options, NVDA options, or LULU options, visit StockOptionsChannel.com.
Today’s Most Active Call & Put Options of the S&P 500 »
Also see:
Top Stocks Held By Leon Cooperman
Institutional Holders of IOAC
NTE Split History
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
Source link